When the Government signs away sovereignty the patriots must revolt.

When the Government signs away sovereignty the patriots must revolt.

There is no justification for including investor-state dispute in the FIPA.


http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2014/09/15/China-Investment-Treaty-Breakdown/?utm_source=fb-page-editor-post&utm_medium=fb-page&utm_campaign=fb-09-2014

There is no justification for including investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in either the CETA or the TTIP.
https://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/reports/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ttip-and-ceta


As a friend, conservative and Harper supporter told me, revolution is the only way to change our system of elected dictatorship.

There are 2 ways to replace Harper
- Stand up against big international pre-election money and bring democracy
- Or embrace to the international money even more than Harper which I don't think is even possible

The trying to embrace pre-election campaign money and democracy is embracing democracy without accountability. And exactly what Harper is best at.


Elections Laws are about the most important of all laws in a Democracy. 
Elections Laws determine the who is elected and who they are accountable to.

The conservatives changes to elections laws, makes it difficult for students and more mobile people to vote.
Banning elections Canada from its duty of informing Canadians how to vote. And enabling uncapped spending for political parties to bring out their supporters, through the $20 exception. Preventing Elections Canada from launching immediate investigations into electoral fraud, dramatically reducing/effectively eliminating any real punishment for over spending.

http://www.slaw.ca/2014/02/09/why-the-conservatives-fair-elections-act-could-be-unconstitutional/

http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/ca_1867.html


Canada's election flawed laws are the reason we not able to obtain a Good Government. If you are in doubt for a second about this. Look at the FIFA, TPP and CETA investment treaties. These are secret agreement and are particularly harmful because it denies public access to arbitration case decisions miss-leading the public into believing their government is able to exercise sovereign powers.

There are 2 ways to replace Harper
Stand up against big international pre-election money and bring democracy
Or embrace to the international money even more than Harper which I don't think is even possible

Trying to embrace pre-election campaign money and democracy is embracing democracy without accountability. And exactly what Harper is best at.

The solution is monitoring and regulating pre-election direct and indirect advertising spending.

Corruption and democracy: Political finances - conflicts of interest -
lobbying - justice (2008)

Harper's Conservative Corruption of the Canadian Supreme Court Judicial selection process.

Harper's Conservatives changed the Canadian Supreme Court Judicial selection process to enable the federal government to remove all candidate Supreme Court Judicial who are NOT favourable towards the federal government leadership and who are less likely to hold the federal government leadership accountable.

“the majority of voting members are now appointed by the minister” and the judicial appointments advisory committees “may neither be, nor be seen to be, fully independent of the government.”

Former Ontario attorney general Michael Bryant is more blunt about where the decision is actually made: “the responsibility for judicial appointments is well entrenched in the PMO.”



The following attached article starts out rather dry and uninteresting until you get to the section about Selecting the selectors. Please bare in mind this article directs towards a legal framework to challenge the corrupted Canadian Supreme Court Judicial selection process. Please remember this when reading this article
The only public guideline to choosing appointment committee members is that “the Minister of Justice attempts to reflect factors appropriate to each jurisdiction including geography, language, multiculturalism, and gender.”
canadianlawyermag.com/5266/Cracking-the-system

In late 2006, the Conservative government rewrote the rules for the composition of the committees. Now each regional committee consists of eight members:

•     a nominee of the provincial or territorial law society;

•     a nominee of the provincial or territorial branch of the Canadian Bar Association;

•     a judge nominated by the chief justice of the province or by the senior judge of the territory;

•     a nominee of the provincial attorney general or territorial minister of justice;

•     a nominee of the law enforcement community; and,

•     three nominees of the federal minister of justice representing the general public.

In 2006, the Conservative government added the nominee from the law enforcement community, who is also chosen ad hoc by the federal government.